borders of European Tectonicity
Mar0
Hamid Sadeghipour
25.03.2010
We had earthquakes in the east and west of Turkey and it was a result of plate tectonics as I mentioned in my recent article. But recent Portugal earthquakes show the earthquakes transfer along a chain. We see Albania and Greece earthquakes simultaneously. These rings of chain are the Turkey land between east and west earthquakes, Greek earthquakes and Greek part , Italian part covering some region of north Africa, and Spain and Portugal. It could be an idea to fix the borders of these parts with each other. Europe has enough population to be able to do so and it could help itself and others. We can find other examples in other continents as well.
Earth Weight Equator
Mar0
Hamid Sadeghipour,
13.03.2010
We can see the aftershocks of the Chilean
Earthquakes and the only thing I can add is we have another equator.
If we trace a line from Turkey to Chile region of earthquake and continue to Tonga, a region of almost occurring earthquake, and continuing to Mariana Islands region we see a line devising the earth in two parts. The weight of each part is equal to the other part. But, this weight is changing and force of winds, streams, tectonics pressure, etc.
The balance of these two parts weight might be causing earthquake as well. Now, this is how to balance?
Turkey Earthquakes and International cooperation
Mar0
Hamid Sadeghipour
09.03.2010
Turkey recent earthquakes show the influence of tectonics action on earthquakes. Hydraulics pressure due to rain and the dam near the earthquakes occurrence places in Turkey recent earthquakes plus magma pressure and porous effects and very latent pressure due to weight of mountains all together made these earthquakes happen. That is why a concentrated international effort to fix the tectonics continents in any means could be less expensive than bearing each of us the consequences of these earthquakes, or hurricanes, fire in the woods, irregular raining the vegetables are accustomed
managing conflicts
Mar0
Hamid Sadeghipour
05/03/2010
- Avoid jumping to a solution before fully analyzing the problem.
- Describe the facts: What is the unsatisfactory situation? What is the context of the conflict? Who is involved? Who are the stakeholders? What is each person’s point of view?
- Define the conflict: Where is the contradiction between the different points of view? Analyze each member’s viewpoint by speaking to them individually about the situation.
- Diagnose the conflict: What preceded the conflict? What are the individual interests? What advantages does each party have? What are the power issues?
- Consider the alternatives, for there is no “best” solution. Sometimes, when the conflict is due to a misunderstanding, explaining the situation in an explicit way may help to resolve the conflict. In other circumstances, the differing points of view cannot be changed, only accepted.
- Implement the solution that has been chosen.
- Evaluate the solution. If the unsatisfactory situation still exists, begin the process again.
- Most of us follow the courses, even during college or university we had conflict solving course. But we forget these points and look for our immediate interests. During 1960-1980 we had philosophers who were protesting the world human conditions, but now, militarism is over everything. People are worrying about their own economic situation. When we had Bam earthquake in Iran, people died, without the need for reconstruction. The lack of people in south of Iran like bam, mobilized people to replace them. Then Indonesia Earthquake with 180 000 people around Indian Ocean died. American and NATO forces were moving to Iraq and Afghanistan. We agree over Carbon two oxides content in the atmosphere but do not agree that military actions around the world could be anti- environmental. We have enough ship movements for goods and merchandises, that earth could not support our conflicts. 5 millions of Chinese after the china earthquake eased the American and NATO presence in Afghanistan. Now we have again 4 millions people without shelter and nothing to do for a while. Of course, again some army attacks to restore the justice and again another devastating earthquake. Arms producing countries, Drug traffickers, smugglers, etc, all should agree like G20 in Copenhagen to reduce their activities. Of course, the earthquake could only be emphasized by human activity and the source of the earthquake remains as before.
When along the coast the soil slides heavily, you have to fix the ocean basin near the coasts. You spend a lot about your militarism, but when something happens to you, you sell more arms to defend you. Some of you say the earthquake never happens in your country, but what about fire in the woods and shrubs, or flood, or hurricanes, or storms. We have to agree on constructing our earth or, one day soon or late is our turn.